Publication Ethics

PUBLICATION POLICY

Editorial and Publication Ethics

The NIU Journal of Business Analytics, Innovation and Global Management is committed to maintaining the highest standards of editorial integrity, ethical publishing, research transparency, and scholarly accountability. This policy outlines the ethical principles, editorial responsibilities, and publication practices followed by the journal to ensure the credibility, reliability, and academic relevance of published research.

Editorship

The journal adheres to internationally recognized standards of editorial conduct. Editors and all individuals involved in publication are expected to uphold fairness, professionalism, transparency, and ethical responsibility.

Editorial decisions are made objectively based solely on academic merit, originality, and relevance of the submitted work.

Ethics

All submissions must comply with rigorous ethical standards. Authors, reviewers, and editors are expected to follow accepted international guidelines for responsible authorship, research integrity, and editorial decision-making.

Transparency & Best Practice

The journal promotes transparency, inclusivity, accessibility, and scholarly excellence.

Editorial decisions are not influenced by nationality, ethnicity, religion, gender, institutional affiliation, or political beliefs, and policies are applied fairly and consistently.

Plagiarism

All submissions are screened using standard plagiarism detection tools to ensure originality.

  • All submitted work must be original
  • Proper citation of all sources is mandatory
  • Unauthorized reuse of text, figures, or ideas is prohibited
  • Misconduct may lead to rejection or further investigation

Conflict of Interest

All participants must disclose any potential conflicts of interest.

Authors: Must disclose financial, institutional, or personal relationships that may influence research.

Researchers: Must ensure independence in study design, analysis, and reporting.

Editors: Must avoid handling manuscripts where conflicts exist.

Reviewers: Must disclose conflicts and decline reviews where impartiality is compromised.

Confidentiality

All manuscripts are treated as confidential documents. Editors and reviewers must not disclose information except to those directly involved in the review process.

Unpublished data must not be used for personal or professional advantage.

Funding Source

Authors must disclose all sources of financial support and explain the role of funding agencies in study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, and publication decisions.

Protection of Research Subjects

Research involving human participants or organizational data must comply with ethical standards and regulations.

  • Proper permissions and approvals must be obtained
  • Confidential data must be protected
  • Ethical use of survey and interview data is required

Appeals

Authors may appeal editorial decisions with clear justification. The editorial board may uphold decisions, request additional review, or reconsider based on merit.

All appeal decisions are final.

Citations

Authors must ensure accurate and ethical citation practices.

  • All claims supported by reliable references
  • Original sources properly cited
  • Citations relevant and appropriate
  • Citation manipulation prohibited

Reviewer Suggestions

Authors may suggest reviewers who are independent, qualified, and free from conflicts of interest.

Data Availability

The journal encourages transparency and reproducibility. Authors should provide a data availability statement indicating whether data are publicly available, included as supplementary material, or available upon request.

Post-publication Corrections

The journal maintains the integrity of the scholarly record by issuing updates when necessary after publication.

Corrections

Corrections are issued when errors affect interpretation but do not invalidate research. A correction notice may be linked to the original article.

Retractions

Retractions are issued for major errors, misconduct, plagiarism, or invalid findings. Retracted articles are clearly marked and accompanied by a retraction notice.

Expressions of Concern

Expressions of Concern are published when serious issues arise but investigations are ongoing. These may later lead to correction or retraction.